Should Raquel Pennington’s Corner Have Thrown In The Towel? I’m Not So Sure

1607

Raquel Pennington had a disfigured nose and repeated over and over again that she was “done.”

Her corner’s response: “Let’s power through this. Let’s believe. Change your mindset. Let’s just throw everything we got. We’ll recover later.”

Two minutes later, Raquel Pennington was bleeding profusely from her nose in the cage after enduring a pounding at the hands of UFC Bantamweight Champion Amanda Nunes. The referee had no choice but to stop the fight.

The coaches’ decision to let the fight continue was understandably met with its share of criticism. UFC Featherweight Brian Ortega tweeted:

UFC Interim Welterweight title contender Rafael dos Anjos agreed…

…as did former UFC fighter and color commentator Kenny Florian:

Michael Chiesa was particularly harsh:

But honestly, I’m not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, if a fighter’s nose were broken like Pennington’s was and she insisted that she was done, then throwing in the towel is the only reasonable option. What exactly were the coaches expecting in the final round of that match?

On the other hand, this is a championship fight in the biggest mixed martial arts promotion in the world. Matches like these can be few and far between, and there is no guarantee they will happen again. Pennington’s corner obviously knew about about all the hard work she had put into the fight, and they were understandably reluctant to throw it all away.

Furthermore, it’s not like they forced her to keep going. It’s not like there were any threats — e.g., “You give up and you’ll never train at this gym again!” Raquel could have ignored their advice and told the referee herself that she was done. She didn’t. She chose to press on.

But did she? A fighter in Pennington’s shape may not be in the position to make decisions about her own safety. Her head was probably swimming from the punches she had endured, and it’s the job of coaches to protect their fighters when they can’t protect themselves.

And even if she did choose it, does that absolve the coaches of their responsibility to protect their fighter? Probably not. There have been plenty of cases of coaches and referees stopping fights even when fighters believed they could continue.

Which brings us to the referee. Where was he in all of this? If Pennington was in no condition to continue, doesn’t the ref deserve some of the blame for letting the match go on? Don’t referees also have an obligation to keep fighters safe?

I suppose it’s moot point now. What’s done is done and Amanda Nunes still reigns supreme atop the Women’s Bantamweight mountain. Raqual Pennington will obviously live to fight another day, and she may even get another chance at UFC gold.

But these questions are worth pondering. Should fighters in Raquel Pennington’s condition be allowed to fight, and should coaches pressure them to continue if they say they can’t?

Honestly, I can see both sides.

 

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here